Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Aug 2023 23:41:57 +0200 | From | Andi Shyti <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 9/9] i2c: designware: Fix spelling and other issues in the comments |
| |
Hi Andy,
[...]
> @@ -210,12 +210,12 @@ static void psp_release_i2c_bus(void) > { > mutex_lock(&psp_i2c_access_mutex); > > - /* Return early if mailbox was malfunctional */ > + /* Return early if mailbox was malfunctioned */
I think "was malfunctioned" is not really correct... maybe "has malfunctioned"? "is malfunctioning"?
> if (psp_i2c_mbox_fail) > goto cleanup;
[...]
> @@ -508,7 +510,7 @@ void __i2c_dw_disable(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) > > /* > * Wait 10 times the signaling period of the highest I2C > - * transfer supported by the driver (for 400KHz this is > + * transfer supported by the driver (for 400kHz this is
what did you change here? :)
The rest looks good.
Thanks, Andi
> * 25us) as described in the DesignWare I2C databook. > */ > usleep_range(25, 250);
| |