lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 11/20] reset: npcm: using syscon instead of device data
Hi Krzysztof

Sorry but I didn't ignore your comment.

For not breaking exciting boards I add the following patch in V2
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220608095623.22327-11-tmaimon77@gmail.com/

On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 13:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 08/06/2022 11:56, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> > Using syscon device tree property instead of
> > device data to handle the NPCM general control
> > registers.
> >
>
> Again ignored the comment.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/reset/reset-npcm.c | 11 +++--------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-npcm.c b/drivers/reset/reset-npcm.c
> > index 2ea4d3136e15..312c3b594b8f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/reset/reset-npcm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-npcm.c
> > @@ -138,8 +138,7 @@ static int npcm_reset_xlate(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> > }
> >
> > static const struct of_device_id npcm_rc_match[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "nuvoton,npcm750-reset",
> > - .data = (void *)"nuvoton,npcm750-gcr" },
> > + { .compatible = "nuvoton,npcm750-reset"},
> > { }
> > };
> >
> > @@ -155,14 +154,10 @@ static int npcm_usb_reset(struct platform_device *pdev, struct npcm_rc_data *rc)
> > u32 ipsrst1_bits = 0;
> > u32 ipsrst2_bits = NPCM_IPSRST2_USB_HOST;
> > u32 ipsrst3_bits = 0;
> > - const char *gcr_dt;
> >
> > - gcr_dt = (const char *)
> > - of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, dev)->data;
> > -
> > - gcr_regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible(gcr_dt);
> > + gcr_regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, "nuvoton,sysgcr");
> > if (IS_ERR(gcr_regmap)) {
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to find %s\n", gcr_dt);
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to find gcr syscon");
> > return PTR_ERR(gcr_regmap);
>
> Comment still ignored.
>
> There is no point in this review if you keep ignoring what we ask to fix.
>
> If something is unclear, ask for clarification. Resending without
> implementing the comment means that you ignore the review which is waste
> of my time.
>
> I am sorry, but this is not acceptable.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Best regards,

Tomer

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-09 23:39    [W:1.198 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site