Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 10 Jun 2022 11:55:53 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 12/20] dt-bindings: reset: npcm: Add support for NPCM8XX | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 10/06/2022 00:05, Tomer Maimon wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > Sorry, but I thought the fix is only to add an explanation to the > dt-binding file as was done in V2. > > The NPCM8XX binding is done in the same way as the NPCM7XX and both > use the same reset driver and use the same reset method in upstreamed > NPCM reset driver. > > Can you please explain again what you suggest to do?
If you want abstract IDs, they must be abstract, so not representing hardware registers. Then they start at 1 and are incremented by 1.
Other option is to skip such IDs entirely and use register offsets/addresses directly, like Arnd suggested in linked documents. I think he expressed it clearly, so please read his answers which I linked in previous discussion.
There is no single reason to store register addresses/values/offsets as binding headers. These are not bindings.
Best regards, Krzysztof
|  |