lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 12/20] dt-bindings: reset: npcm: Add support for NPCM8XX
From
On 10/06/2022 00:05, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Sorry, but I thought the fix is only to add an explanation to the
> dt-binding file as was done in V2.
>
> The NPCM8XX binding is done in the same way as the NPCM7XX and both
> use the same reset driver and use the same reset method in upstreamed
> NPCM reset driver.
>
> Can you please explain again what you suggest to do?

If you want abstract IDs, they must be abstract, so not representing
hardware registers. Then they start at 1 and are incremented by 1.

Other option is to skip such IDs entirely and use register
offsets/addresses directly, like Arnd suggested in linked documents. I
think he expressed it clearly, so please read his answers which I linked
in previous discussion.

There is no single reason to store register addresses/values/offsets as
binding headers. These are not bindings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-10 11:58    [W:0.165 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site