| From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Date | Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:35:09 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 18/49] mfd: qcom-pm8008: Add broken_mask_unmask irq chip flag |
| |
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:08 PM Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com> wrote: > > The qcom-pm8008 appears to use "1 to enable" convention for > enabling interrupts, with separate set and clear registers. > It's relying on masks and unmasks being inverted from their
It relies
> intuitive meaning, so it needs the broken_mask_unmask flag.
How has it worked until now?
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
|