| From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Date | Thu, 21 Oct 2021 10:09:46 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 21/20] signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV) |
| |
Hi Eric,
Patch 21/20?
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:52 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote: > Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing > to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is > wanted. So change every instance we can to make the code clearer. > > Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
|