lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 21/20] signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV)
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> Patch 21/20?

In reviewing another part of the patchset Linus asked if force_sigsegv
could go away. It can't completely but I can get this far.

Given that it is just a cleanup it makes most sense to me as an
additional patch on top of what is already here.


> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:52 PM Eric W. Biederman
> <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>> Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing
>> to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is
>> wanted. So change every instance we can to make the code clearer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>
>> arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
>
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

Thank you.

Eric

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-21 15:35    [W:0.873 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site