lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote:
> > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> > niggly little warnings.
> >
> > After these patches are applied, the build system no longer
> > complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq.
>
> And you need to rebase this stuff of pm/linux-next, as there are some
> changes in cpufreq.c there.

It's based on the latest -next. Is pm/linux-next in -next?

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-15 08:33    [W:0.358 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site