lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq
On 15-07-20, 07:32, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> > On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> > > niggly little warnings.
> > >
> > > After these patches are applied, the build system no longer
> > > complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq.
> >
> > And you need to rebase this stuff of pm/linux-next, as there are some
> > changes in cpufreq.c there.
>
> It's based on the latest -next. Is pm/linux-next in -next?

Yes it is. Actually my bad, I based it on my next which didn't had
pm/linux-next :)

--
viresh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-15 08:38    [W:0.584 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site