lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
Subject[PATCH 3.16 196/410] arm64: KVM: Increment PC after handling an SMC trap
3.16.57-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

commit f5115e8869e1dfafac0e414b4f1664f3a84a4683 upstream.

When handling an SMC trap, the "preferred return address" is set
to that of the SMC, and not the next PC (which is a departure from
the behaviour of an SMC that isn't trapped).

Increment PC in the handler, as the guest is otherwise forever
stuck...

Fixes: acfb3b883f6d ("arm64: KVM: Fix SMCCC handling of unimplemented SMC/HVC calls")
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -43,7 +43,16 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *v

static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
{
+ /*
+ * "If an SMC instruction executed at Non-secure EL1 is
+ * trapped to EL2 because HCR_EL2.TSC is 1, the exception is a
+ * Trap exception, not a Secure Monitor Call exception [...]"
+ *
+ * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would
+ * otherwise return to the same address...
+ */
*vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) = ~0UL;
+ kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
return 1;
}

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-07 17:19    [W:0.991 / U:0.828 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site