Messages in this thread |  | | From | Grant Likely <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/33] Sanitize devm_request_and_ioremap() | Date | Sat, 09 Feb 2013 13:58:42 +0000 |
| |
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:08:53 +0100, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> wrote: > Recent discussions about the lack of a meaningful error code returned by > devm_request_and_ioremap() have triggered this patch series. One common > issue is that the function returns NULL in all failure cases, making it > impossible to determine what went wrong exactly. Another problem is that > people can't seem to agree on what error code to return in case where > the function fails. Both of these problems lead to inconsistent usage. > > This series attempts to fix this by providing a replacement function, > devm_ioremap_resource(), which returns a pointer to the remapped memory > region on success and an ERR_PTR()-encoded error code on failure. Users > can check for failure using the IS_ERR() macro and determine the exact > cause by extracting the error code using PTR_ERR(). > > Patch 1 adds the new devm_ioremap_resource() function, which is really > just a renamed version of devm_request_and_ioremap() that returns > ERR_PTR()-encoded error codes on failure and makes the old function a > wrapper around it, returning NULL in case of devm_ioremap_resource() > failure. Furthermore the patch marks devm_request_and_ioremap() as a > deprecated function to make it clear that it should no longer be used. > A semantic patch is included that was used to convert the bulk of the > existing calls to devm_request_and_ioremap() to the new API. The patch > is far from perfect and a few occurrences had to be converted or fixed > up manually. > > The remaining patches convert each subsystem separately to use the new > API. > > Thierry
I know that this series has wide support and will probably be merged, but I'm reply to this for the record. I do not think the ERR_PTR pattern is a good idea because it goes against expectations of what is and is not a valid pointer.
Nacked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Greg, if you're merging this series then don't let my objection inhibit spi & gpio changes. I may not be happy, but I won't be an ass about it.
g.
|  |