Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:57:31 -0500 (EST) | From | Patrick Finnegan <> | Subject | Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk) |
| |
On 2 Nov 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 20:36, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > Oh please.... > > Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the > > qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like > > the library? > > Lota of installations have gtk but don't have qt.
And a lot of installations have QT but not GTK... This feels like a vi vs emacs discussion.
Personally, it makes no difference to me which library is used. I'm doubtful I'll use anything other than menuconfig unless it makes my life a *whole* lot easier. I'd say 'choose one and get on with it.'
Pat -- Purdue Universtiy ITAP/RCS Information Technology at Purdue Research Computing and Storage http://www-rcd.cc.purdue.edu
http://dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/images/dilbert2040637020924.gif
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |