Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 2 Nov 2002 12:00:50 -0500 (EST) | From | Jon Portnoy <> | Subject | Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk) |
| |
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Nero (neroz@iinet.net.au) wrote: > > Romain Lievin wrote: > > [snip] > > > > Yes please :) > > GTK+ is probably the most common (decent) toolkit out there - nearly any > > system with X has it installed, from what I've seen. > > Oh please.... > Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the > qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like > the library? > > Dave
Why? I have a couple boxes that have GTK and don't have QT. A GTK-based configuration system would be most useful.
Diversity and choice are good things.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |