Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 2 Nov 2002 21:07:24 +0000 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk) |
| |
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 08:36:08PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the > qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like > the library?
Maybe, maybe not. Most, if not all of my boxes here don't have qt, and they're not going to get qt any time soon. qt has a long list of dependencies which gtk doesn't have, which, imho is an overriding factor for why we should have a gtk implementation.
Not that I used the old xconfig often anyway. 8)
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |