Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 2 Nov 2002 23:28:36 +0000 | From | "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <> | Subject | Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk) |
| |
* Patrick Finnegan (pat@purdueriots.com) wrote: > On 2 Nov 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > > On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 20:36, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > > Oh please.... > > > Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the > > > qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like > > > the library? > > > > Lota of installations have gtk but don't have qt. > > And a lot of installations have QT but not GTK... This feels like a vi vs > emacs discussion. > > Personally, it makes no difference to me which library is used. I'm > doubtful I'll use anything other than menuconfig unless it makes my life a > *whole* lot easier. I'd say 'choose one and get on with it.'
Exactly my point. I just don't see the point in spending the neuron hours on both.
But you guys who are worried about space and dependencies always can: 1) use menuconfig 2) Write one in Tcl/Tk which is nice and small and portable and has few dependencies......oh we've been there.
Dave ---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ---------------------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM, SPARC and HP-PA | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |