Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 06 Nov 2002 02:25:11 +0100 | From | Mariusz Zielinski <> | Subject | Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk) |
| |
On Wednesday 06 of November 2002 01:45, Bill Davidsen wrote: > On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Patrick Finnegan wrote: > > > Lota of installations have gtk but don't have qt. > > > > And a lot of installations have QT but not GTK... This feels like a vi vs > > emacs discussion. > > Was this just to cover the possibilities or do you know of such? I guess > all system which build kernels have QT, it won't build without it :-( I > know that's going to be fixed RSN. > > > Personally, it makes no difference to me which library is used. I'm > > doubtful I'll use anything other than menuconfig unless it makes my life > > a *whole* lot easier. I'd say 'choose one and get on with it.' > > That's not likely, but perhaps all the groups which have or want a GUI > could define a standard interface which could go in the kernel, and then > any GIU could interpret the metadata from that and display it any way they > want. > > Just a thought, I have no axe to grind, menuconfig is the only thing > reasonable to config remote machines. Any GUI over ssh over somewhat slow > open net connections is vastly unproductive.
You have to forgive me this joke. - Let's hang the guy who introduced QT into kernel and be friends again.
-- Mariusz Zielinski
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |