lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 5.4 115/120] xfs: use bitops interface for buf log item AIL flag check
Date
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

commit 826f7e34130a4ce756138540170cbe935c537a47 upstream.

The xfs_log_item flags were converted to atomic bitops as of commit
22525c17ed ("xfs: log item flags are racy"). The assert check for
AIL presence in xfs_buf_item_relse() still uses the old value based
check. This likely went unnoticed as XFS_LI_IN_AIL evaluates to 0
and causes the assert to unconditionally pass. Fix up the check.

Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Fixes: 22525c17ed ("xfs: log item flags are racy")
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ xfs_buf_item_relse(
struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = bp->b_log_item;

trace_xfs_buf_item_relse(bp, _RET_IP_);
- ASSERT(!(bip->bli_item.li_flags & XFS_LI_IN_AIL));
+ ASSERT(!test_bit(XFS_LI_IN_AIL, &bip->bli_item.li_flags));

bp->b_log_item = NULL;
if (list_empty(&bp->b_li_list))

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-26 12:55    [W:0.366 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site