Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:22:24 -0400 | From | Sasha Levin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5.4 097/120] gpio: ixp4xx: Make irqchip immutable |
| |
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 05:58:49PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 06:40:02AM -0400, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> Greg, >> >> On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 06:12:10 -0400, >> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> > >> > From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >> > >> > [ Upstream commit 94e9bc73d85aa6ecfe249e985ff57abe0ab35f34 ] >> > >> > This turns the IXP4xx GPIO irqchip into an immutable >> > irqchip, a bit different from the standard template due >> > to being hierarchical. >> > >> > Tested on the IXP4xx which uses drivers/ata/pata_ixp4xx_cf.c >> > for a rootfs on compact flash with IRQs from this GPIO >> > block to the CF ATA controller. >> > >> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> >> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >> > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> >> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> >> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> >> >> We had that discussion[1], and concluded that none of these should be >> backported to a kernel earlier than 5.19. 5.4 doesn't currently >> contain the relevant infrastructure, nor should that infrastructure >> should be backported either. >> >> Can we *please* stop this? >> >> M. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMRc=Md9JKdW8wmbun_0_1y2RQbck7q=vzOkdw6n+FBgpf0h8w@mail.gmail.com/ > >Sasha, what went wrong here? > >Now dropped from all but 5.19.y, thanks.
Sorry about that, I misunderstood Bartosz's reply and went off based on that.
-- Thanks, Sasha
| |