lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add missing core_bi_pll_test_se GCC clock
From


On 28.12.2022 12:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/12/2022 12:37, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28.12.2022 12:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> The GCC bindings expect core_bi_pll_test_se clock input, even if it is
>>> optional:
>>>
>>> sm8350-mtp.dtb: clock-controller@100000: clock-names:2: 'core_bi_pll_test_se' was expected
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>> Is it even going to be used by anybody, or should we just drop
>> it on the driver side as per usual?
>
> It's mentioned as possible parent, so there might be users somewhere...
> Or you want to say that other binding and DTS users cannot use that clock?
There's no driver (even downstream) for a supplier of this clock and it's
(probably) only used for early validation by qcom folks. What we're
interested in, as far as debugging clocks goes, is handled by debugcc [1].

Konrad

[1] https://github.com/andersson/debugcc/
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:22    [W:0.130 / U:0.608 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site