lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add missing core_bi_pll_test_se GCC clock
From
On 28/12/2022 13:50, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 28/12/2022 13:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/12/2022 12:37, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28.12.2022 12:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> The GCC bindings expect core_bi_pll_test_se clock input, even if it is
>>>> optional:
>>>>
>>>> sm8350-mtp.dtb: clock-controller@100000: clock-names:2: 'core_bi_pll_test_se' was expected
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>> Is it even going to be used by anybody, or should we just drop
>>> it on the driver side as per usual?
>>
>> It's mentioned as possible parent, so there might be users somewhere...
>> Or you want to say that other binding and DTS users cannot use that clock?
>
> Yes. In the past few months we have been removing the core_bi_pll_test
> from the old clock drivers (and new clock drivers mostly lack them).
> Let's remove it from the rest of clock drivers.

If you are going to start doing the same work, please at least share it
upfront.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:22    [W:0.041 / U:0.988 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site