Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Dec 2022 16:34:56 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add missing core_bi_pll_test_se GCC clock | From | Dmitry Baryshkov <> |
| |
On 28/12/2022 16:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28/12/2022 13:50, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On 28/12/2022 13:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 28/12/2022 12:37, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 28.12.2022 12:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>> The GCC bindings expect core_bi_pll_test_se clock input, even if it is >>>>> optional: >>>>> >>>>> sm8350-mtp.dtb: clock-controller@100000: clock-names:2: 'core_bi_pll_test_se' was expected >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >>>>> --- >>>> Is it even going to be used by anybody, or should we just drop >>>> it on the driver side as per usual? >>> >>> It's mentioned as possible parent, so there might be users somewhere... >>> Or you want to say that other binding and DTS users cannot use that clock? >> >> Yes. In the past few months we have been removing the core_bi_pll_test >> from the old clock drivers (and new clock drivers mostly lack them). >> Let's remove it from the rest of clock drivers. > > If you are going to start doing the same work, please at least share it > upfront.
Excuse me.
-- With best wishes Dmitry
| |