Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Antonio Borneo <> | Subject | [PATCH 1/4] checkpatch: fix multiple const * types | Date | Wed, 8 May 2019 14:27:18 +0200 |
| |
Commit 1574a29f8e76 ("checkpatch: allow multiple const * types") claims to support repetition of pattern "const *", but it actually allows only one extra instance. Check the following lines int a(char const * const x[]); int b(char const * const *x); int c(char const * const * const x[]); int d(char const * const * const *x); with command ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --show-types -f filename to find that only the first line passes the test, while a warning is triggered by the other 3 lines: WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'char const * const' should also have an identifier name The reason is that the pattern match halts at the second asterisk in the line, thus the remaining text starting with asterisk fails to match a valid name for a variable.
Fixed by replacing "?" (Match 1 or 0 times) with "*" (Match 0 or more times) in the regular expression. Fix also the similar test for types in unusual order.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com> Fixes: 1574a29f8e76 ("checkpatch: allow multiple const * types") --- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index a09333fd7cef..f40d4bb2fbb9 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -802,12 +802,12 @@ sub build_types { }x; $Type = qr{ $NonptrType - (?:(?:\s|\*|\[\])+\s*const|(?:\s|\*\s*(?:const\s*)?|\[\])+|(?:\s*\[\s*\])+)? + (?:(?:\s|\*|\[\])+\s*const|(?:\s|\*\s*(?:const\s*)?|\[\])+|(?:\s*\[\s*\])+)* (?:\s+$Inline|\s+$Modifier)* }x; $TypeMisordered = qr{ $NonptrTypeMisordered - (?:(?:\s|\*|\[\])+\s*const|(?:\s|\*\s*(?:const\s*)?|\[\])+|(?:\s*\[\s*\])+)? + (?:(?:\s|\*|\[\])+\s*const|(?:\s|\*\s*(?:const\s*)?|\[\])+|(?:\s*\[\s*\])+)* (?:\s+$Inline|\s+$Modifier)* }x; $Declare = qr{(?:$Storage\s+(?:$Inline\s+)?)?$Type}; -- 2.21.0
| |