lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/7] ARM: dts: socfpga: add gpio pieces
From
Hi,

I saw this patch as it came in through Dinh's pull request, see below:


On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> The cycloneV has three gpio controllers, the first two with 29 gpios, the last
> one with 27. This patch adds the three controller with the gpio driver which is
> now sitting the gpio tree.
>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Alan Tull <atull@altera.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> v1…v2:
> - #gpio-cells = <2>
> - third gpio block has now only 27 gpios
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> index 537f1a5..2a84e67 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> @@ -463,6 +463,70 @@
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> + gpio@ff708000 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + compatible = "snps,dw-apb-gpio";
> + reg = <0xff708000 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&per_base_clk>;
> + status = "disabled";
> +
> + gpio0: gpio-controller@0 {
> + compatible = "snps,dw-apb-gpio-port";
> + gpio-controller;
> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> + snps,nr-gpios = <29>;
> + reg = <0>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + interrupts = <0 164 4>;
> + };
> + };

This is an odd setup. We usually would have it all in one node, since
the @ff708000 is the GPIO controller, instead of adding a subnode with
the actual GPIO info.

So I would have expected something more like:


gpio0: gpio-controller@ff708000 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
compatible = "snps,dw-apb-gpio";
reg = <0xff708000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <0 164 4>;
clocks = <&per_base_clk>;
status = "disabled";
gpio-controller;
#gpio-cells = <2>;
snps,nr-gpios = <29>;
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
};


... or is there some underlying reason for having the two-layer
approach that isn't obvious from this device tree?


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-06 00:21    [W:1.706 / U:0.664 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site