Messages in this thread | | | From | Alexandre Courbot <> | Date | Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:17:40 +0900 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpio: dwapb: use d->mask instead od BIT(bit) |
| |
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote: > d->mask contains exact the same information as BIT(bit) so we could save > a few cycles here. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 25 ++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c > index 3c9cdda..ebfcf5c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c > @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void dwapb_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d) > > irq_gc_lock(igc); > val = readl(gpio->regs + GPIO_INTEN); > - val |= BIT(d->hwirq); > + val |= d->mask; > writel(val, gpio->regs + GPIO_INTEN); > irq_gc_unlock(igc); > } > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void dwapb_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d) > > irq_gc_lock(igc); > val = readl(gpio->regs + GPIO_INTEN); > - val &= ~BIT(d->hwirq); > + val &= d->mask;
Shouldn't that be ~d->mask here?
| |