Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:33:39 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/6] dmaengine: introduce is_slave_xfer function | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 16 November 2012 19:29, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > This function helps to distinguish the slave type of transfer by checking the > direction parameter. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > --- > include/linux/dmaengine.h | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h > index 6402b18..3e1a9026 100644 > --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h > +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h > @@ -618,6 +618,11 @@ static inline int dmaengine_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan, > (unsigned long)config); > } > > +static inline bool is_slave_xfer(enum dma_transfer_direction direction) > +{ > + return (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) || (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM); > +}
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Though i still have vote to include DMA_DEV_TO_DEV in thist list :)
| |