Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 4 Feb 2023 15:12:42 +0300 | Subject | Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm: dts: mt7623: mux phy0 on Bananapi BPI-R2 | From | Arınç ÜNAL <> |
| |
On 4.02.2023 14:43, Frank Wunderlich wrote: >> Gesendet: Samstag, 04. Februar 2023 um 11:27 Uhr >> Von: "Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@public-files.de> >> An: "Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> >> Cc: arinc9.unal@gmail.com, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com, "Sean Wang" <sean.wang@mediatek.com>, "DENG Qingfang" <dqfext@gmail.com> >> Betreff: Aw: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm: dts: mt7623: mux phy0 on Bananapi BPI-R2 >> >> Hi aranc, >> >> have tested this series, basicly it works, but i get only ~620 Mbits/sec (much more i will need on wan) in tx-mode of r2, rx-mode (iperf3 -c IP -R on r2) gets full 939 Mbits/sec. Both no retransmitts. >> >> tried with my laptop which gets 940Mbit/sec in tx mode too...other end is a R2 with 5.15 connected to lan0 (and eth1+aux enabled, dmesg clean so far...for the "kernel log flooded"-comment). >> >> maybe gmac1 needs to be tweaked a bit (clock-settings)? >> >> can you confirm this with your board? > > tested the vlan_aware way with 5.15.80 and got better result > > ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 > ip l set aux master br0 > ip l set wan master br0 > bridge vlan add vid 99 dev wan > bridge vlan add vid 99 dev aux > bridge vlan > ip l s eth1 up > ip l s wan up > ip a a 192.168.0.11/24 dev eth1 > ip l s br0 up > ip l s aux up > > i see traffic on eth1 increasing and iperf3 shows in both directions ~940Mbit/s, no strange mesages in dmesg while testing...where do you see these?
You didn't put eth1 on a bridge. I suggest you read my mails with higher attention so both of our time is spent efficiently.
> > tested vlan-way with 6.2 and felix' Patches to more comparable with your test...and got same result (~625Mbit/s in tx and 940Mbit/s in rx-mode=-R on r2)...so it seems anything between 5.15 and 6.2 reduced gmac1 tx bandwidth.
I don't see an incentive to investigate unless the issue is confirmed on a daily netdev/net-next.git main tree.
> > to summarize: > > i get same result with your patches and my old vlan_bridge way with same codebase...how do i see your problem with the vlan-bridge-way? Do you test with bpi-r2 or only any other board and change r2 to have same DT?
I tested this only on a Bananapi BPI-R2 using the devicetree with this series applied on a few days old netdev/net-next.git main tree.
Arınç
| |