Messages in this thread | | | From | Frank Wunderlich <> | Subject | Aw: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm: dts: mt7623: mux phy0 on Bananapi BPI-R2 | Date | Sat, 4 Feb 2023 12:43:47 +0100 |
| |
> Gesendet: Samstag, 04. Februar 2023 um 11:27 Uhr > Von: "Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@public-files.de> > An: "Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> > Cc: arinc9.unal@gmail.com, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com, "Sean Wang" <sean.wang@mediatek.com>, "DENG Qingfang" <dqfext@gmail.com> > Betreff: Aw: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm: dts: mt7623: mux phy0 on Bananapi BPI-R2 > > Hi aranc, > > have tested this series, basicly it works, but i get only ~620 Mbits/sec (much more i will need on wan) in tx-mode of r2, rx-mode (iperf3 -c IP -R on r2) gets full 939 Mbits/sec. Both no retransmitts. > > tried with my laptop which gets 940Mbit/sec in tx mode too...other end is a R2 with 5.15 connected to lan0 (and eth1+aux enabled, dmesg clean so far...for the "kernel log flooded"-comment). > > maybe gmac1 needs to be tweaked a bit (clock-settings)? > > can you confirm this with your board?
tested the vlan_aware way with 5.15.80 and got better result
ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 ip l set aux master br0 ip l set wan master br0 bridge vlan add vid 99 dev wan bridge vlan add vid 99 dev aux bridge vlan ip l s eth1 up ip l s wan up ip a a 192.168.0.11/24 dev eth1 ip l s br0 up ip l s aux up
i see traffic on eth1 increasing and iperf3 shows in both directions ~940Mbit/s, no strange mesages in dmesg while testing...where do you see these?
tested vlan-way with 6.2 and felix' Patches to more comparable with your test...and got same result (~625Mbit/s in tx and 940Mbit/s in rx-mode=-R on r2)...so it seems anything between 5.15 and 6.2 reduced gmac1 tx bandwidth.
to summarize:
i get same result with your patches and my old vlan_bridge way with same codebase...how do i see your problem with the vlan-bridge-way? Do you test with bpi-r2 or only any other board and change r2 to have same DT?
regards Frank
| |