Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | Date | Sat, 3 Dec 2022 14:10:56 +0800 (CST) | From | <> | Subject | [PATCH linux-next] m68k: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy() |
| |
From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn>
The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com> --- arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c index cb6def585851..37fb663559b4 100644 --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c @@ -90,8 +90,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) config_BSP(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line));
#if defined(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM) - strncpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line)); - command_line[sizeof(command_line) - 1] = 0; + strscpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line)); #endif /* CONFIG_BOOTPARAM */
process_uboot_commandline(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line)); -- 2.15.2
|  |