Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 5 Dec 2022 10:02:11 +1000 | Subject | Re: [PATCH linux-next] m68k: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy() | From | Greg Ungerer <> |
| |
Hi Xu,
On 3/12/22 16:10, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn wrote: > From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn> > > The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer. > > Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn> > Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com>
Thanks. Seeing as this is non-MMU related I'll take this through the m68knommu git tree. Applied to the for-next branch.
Regards Greg
> --- > arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c > index cb6def585851..37fb663559b4 100644 > --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c > +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c > @@ -90,8 +90,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > config_BSP(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line)); > > #if defined(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM) > - strncpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line)); > - command_line[sizeof(command_line) - 1] = 0; > + strscpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line)); > #endif /* CONFIG_BOOTPARAM */ > > process_uboot_commandline(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line));
|  |