lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH] watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Issue a reset before we put the PM clocks
Date


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
> Sent: 14 November 2022 18:09
> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>; Wim Van Sebroeck
> <wim@linux-watchdog.org>; Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>; Philipp Zabel
> <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>; linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org;
> Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>; Biju Das
> <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>; Fabrizio Castro
> <fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com>; Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-
> lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Issue a reset before we put the PM
> clocks
>
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
>
> On RZ/Five SoC it was observed that setting timeout (to say 1 sec) wouldn't
> reset the system. To fix this we make sure we issue a reset before putting
> the PM clocks to make sure the registers have been cleared.
>
> While at it re-used rzg2l_wdt_stop() in rzg2l_wdt_set_timeout() as we were
> calling the same functions here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> ---
> Note,
> - This patch has been tested on RZ/G2L, RZ/V2M and RZ/Five.
> - My initial investigation showed adding the delay after
> pm_runtime_get_sync()
> also fixed this issue.
> - Do I need add the fixes tag ? what should be the operation PUT-
> >RESET/RESET->PUT?

It looks like timing issue, None of the previous devices are affected by this.

> in case we need the tag is:
> Fixes: 4055ee81009e6 ("watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Add set_timeout callback")
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c
> index 00438ceed17a..d1271cc7750f 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c
> @@ -115,16 +115,14 @@ static int rzg2l_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdev)
> {
> struct rzg2l_wdt_priv *priv = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdev);
>
> - pm_runtime_put(wdev->parent);
> reset_control_reset(priv->rstc);
> + pm_runtime_put(wdev->parent);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int rzg2l_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdev, unsigned int
> timeout) {
> - struct rzg2l_wdt_priv *priv = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdev);
> -
> wdev->timeout = timeout;
>
> /*
> @@ -132,8 +130,7 @@ static int rzg2l_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device
> *wdev, unsigned int time
> * register so that it is updated with new timeout values.
> */


Maybe update the comment above with new code change.

Cheers,
Biju

> if (watchdog_active(wdev)) {
> - pm_runtime_put(wdev->parent);
> - reset_control_reset(priv->rstc);
> + rzg2l_wdt_stop(wdev);
> rzg2l_wdt_start(wdev);
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-14 19:43    [W:0.520 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site