lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [patch 00/15] x86/tlb: Unexport per-CPU tlbstate
Date
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes:
> Just looking over some exports at the end of the series (and thus
> ignoring bisection issues):
>
> - Is there any good reason to keep __flush_tlb_all inline vs moving it
> out of line and kill the flush_tlb_local and flush_tlb_global exports.
> Also there is just a single modular users in SVM, I wonder if there is
> any way to get rid of that one as well.

I'll have a look again.

> Also I think cpu_tlbstate itself could be marked static in tlb.c with
> a few more changes, I wonder if would be worth it?

Unfortunately it can't. We need it in the low level entry code due to
PTI and solving that would be a messy surgery.

Thanks,

tglx


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-20 19:28    [W:0.161 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site