lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] Convert timekeeping core to use printk_deferred (v2)
On Fri, 2 May 2014 16:05:36 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:


> Would "printk_deferred_once" be more logical than
> "printk_once_deferred"? Think so. It's (((printk(deferred(once))),
> not (((printk(once(deferred))).

Or printk_once_removed()? Or does that only deal with cousins?

-- Steve


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-05 17:41    [W:0.103 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site