Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 05 May 2014 13:25:00 -0700 | From | John Stultz <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] Convert timekeeping core to use printk_deferred (v2) |
| |
On 05/05/2014 11:42 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2 May 2014 16:05:36 -0700 > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > >> Would "printk_deferred_once" be more logical than >> "printk_once_deferred"? Think so. It's (((printk(deferred(once))), >> not (((printk(once(deferred))). >> > I agree with the above, but other than that you can add my: > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Thanks, will do!
> > also, perhaps this series should include my patch: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/25/336
So this set applies ontop of -mm, which I believe includes your change.
If I try to cherry-pick your patch to include in my set, I think I have to cherry-pick Jan's changes as well, so its probably just easier for folks to grab -mm. :) thanks -john
| |