lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] tools/liblockdep: Fix debug_check thinko in mutex destroy
Date
In mutex destroy code currently we pass to debug_check_no_locks_freed()

[mem_from, mem_end)

address region. But debug_check_no_locks_freed() accepts

mem_from, mem_*len*

i.e. second parameter is region length, not end address. And it was
always so, starting from 2006 (fbb9ce95 "lockdep: core").

Fix it, or else on a mutex destroy we wrongly check
much-wider-than-mutex region and can find not-yet-released other locks
there and wrongly report BUGs on them.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@nexedi.com>
---
tools/lib/lockdep/preload.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/lockdep/preload.c b/tools/lib/lockdep/preload.c
index 6f80360..0b0112c 100644
--- a/tools/lib/lockdep/preload.c
+++ b/tools/lib/lockdep/preload.c
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ int pthread_mutex_destroy(pthread_mutex_t *mutex)
*
* TODO: Hook into free() and add that check there as well.
*/
- debug_check_no_locks_freed(mutex, mutex + sizeof(*mutex));
+ debug_check_no_locks_freed(mutex, sizeof(*mutex));
__del_lock(__get_lock(mutex));
return ll_pthread_mutex_destroy(mutex);
}
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ int pthread_rwlock_destroy(pthread_rwlock_t *rwlock)
{
try_init_preload();

- debug_check_no_locks_freed(rwlock, rwlock + sizeof(*rwlock));
+ debug_check_no_locks_freed(rwlock, sizeof(*rwlock));
__del_lock(__get_lock(rwlock));
return ll_pthread_rwlock_destroy(rwlock);
}
--
2.2.0.309.gc3c329f

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-08 13:01    [W:0.038 / U:2.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site