Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref] | Date | Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:03:50 +0200 |
| |
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 02:47:39 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20130408: > > > > The vfs tree still had its build failure so I used the version from > > next-20130405. > > > > The wireless-next tree lost its build failure. > > > > The mfd tree still had its build failure so I used the version from > > next-20130405. > > > > The ftrace tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > > > The arm-soc tree gained conflicts against the omap_dss2 and gpio-lw trees. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > On reboot I see hanging cpufreq with the help of kdb/kgdb? > See screenshot. > > I have also a screenshot with next-20130326, so this issue seems not to be new.
This is during CPU offline. Does it only happen on reboot? What about trying to offline/online CPUs from sysfs?
Rafael
-- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
| |