lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]
From
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 02:47:39 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Changes since 20130408:
>> >
>> > The vfs tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
>> > next-20130405.
>> >
>> > The wireless-next tree lost its build failure.
>> >
>> > The mfd tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
>> > next-20130405.
>> >
>> > The ftrace tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>> >
>> > The arm-soc tree gained conflicts against the omap_dss2 and gpio-lw trees.
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>>
>> On reboot I see hanging cpufreq with the help of kdb/kgdb?
>> See screenshot.
>>
>> I have also a screenshot with next-20130326, so this issue seems not to be new.
>
> This is during CPU offline. Does it only happen on reboot? What about trying
> to offline/online CPUs from sysfs?
>

I have seen it on reboots.
How to online/offline from sysfs?

- Sedat -

> Rafael
>
>
> --
> I speak only for myself.
> Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-04-09 16:21    [W:0.082 / U:2.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site