Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:12:50 +0000 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] pciehp: Add pciehp_surprise module option |
| |
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:11:15PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:52:34 +0000, > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Well that just sounds like a bug. What's the downside to just ignoring > > that capability bit? > > I'm afraid that it's too radical to enable always.
Why?
> Or, what about to check this bit only for disable path?
What happens if you unplug the device on one of the affected machines?
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |