lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: netback: remove redundant xenvif_put
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:03:49 +0000
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

> >>> On 19.02.13 at 06:53, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> > From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> > Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:29:20 +0100
> >
> >> netbk_fatal_tx_err() calls xenvif_carrier_off(), which does
> >> a xenvif_put(). As callers of netbk_fatal_tx_err should only
> >> have one reference to the vif at this time, then the xenvif_put
> >> in netbk_fatal_tx_err is one too many.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> >
> > Applied.
>
> But this is wrong from all we can tell, we discussed this before
> (Wei pointed to the discussion in an earlier reply). The core of
> it is that the put here parallels the one in netbk_tx_err(), and
> the one in xenvif_carrier_off() matches the get from
> xenvif_connect() (which normally would be done on the path
> coming through xenvif_disconnect()).

I see the balance described by Ian in [1] now. Sorry that I missed
that previous discussion and generated this noise.

[1] http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=136084174026977&w=2

drew

>
> And anyway - shouldn't changes to netback require an ack from
> Ian?
>
> Jan
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-19 10:42    [W:0.859 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site