Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 5 Sep 2012 15:09:25 +0800 | Subject | [PATCH] drbd: use list_move_tail instead of list_del/list_add_tail | From | Wei Yongjun <> |
| |
From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
Using list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail().
spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem. (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn> --- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c index 6bce2cc..a196281 100644 --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c @@ -141,8 +141,7 @@ static void drbd_endio_write_sec_final(struct drbd_epoch_entry *e) __releases(lo spin_lock_irqsave(&mdev->req_lock, flags); mdev->writ_cnt += e->size >> 9; - list_del(&e->w.list); /* has been on active_ee or sync_ee */ - list_add_tail(&e->w.list, &mdev->done_ee); + list_move_tail(&e->w.list, &mdev->done_ee); /* No hlist_del_init(&e->collision) here, we did not send the Ack yet, * neither did we wake possibly waiting conflicting requests.
| |