lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/31] perf, x86: Basic Haswell PEBS support
From
Date
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 21:31 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x11d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.STLB_MISS_LOADS */
> + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x12d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.STLB_MISS_STORES */
> + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x21d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.LOCK_LOADS */

Did you miss umask 22, LOCK_STORES ? (I haven't looked at the SDM yet,
just seeing a glitch in the pattern).

> + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x41d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.SPLIT_LOADS */
> + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x42d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.SPLIT_STORES */
> + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x81d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.ALL_LOADS */
> + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x82d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.ALL_STORES */

Just wondering, are there all d0 events? Or is this a specific subset?
That is, why not use:

INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xd0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.* */



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-28 11:41    [W:0.387 / U:0.820 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site