Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Yan Hong <> | Subject | [PATCH 1/3] fs/block_dev.c: need not to check inode->i_bdev in bd_forget() | Date | Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:38:28 +0800 |
| |
Its only caller evict() has promised a non-NULL inode->i_bdev.
Signed-off-by: Yan Hong <clouds.yan@gmail.com> --- fs/block_dev.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c index 38e721b..9bdbd9b 100644 --- a/fs/block_dev.c +++ b/fs/block_dev.c @@ -669,11 +669,9 @@ void bd_forget(struct inode *inode) struct block_device *bdev = NULL; spin_lock(&bdev_lock); - if (inode->i_bdev) { - if (!sb_is_blkdev_sb(inode->i_sb)) - bdev = inode->i_bdev; - __bd_forget(inode); - } + if (!sb_is_blkdev_sb(inode->i_sb)) + bdev = inode->i_bdev; + __bd_forget(inode); spin_unlock(&bdev_lock); if (bdev) -- 1.7.9.5
| |