lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 3/3] fs/fs-writeback.c: remove unneccesary parameter of __writeback_single_inode()
Date
The parameter 'wb' is never used in this function.

Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan Hong <clouds.yan@gmail.com>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index be3efc4..da746e8 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -438,8 +438,7 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
* setting I_SYNC flag and calling inode_sync_complete() to clear it.
*/
static int
-__writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
- struct writeback_control *wbc)
+__writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
long nr_to_write = wbc->nr_to_write;
@@ -526,7 +525,7 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
inode->i_state |= I_SYNC;
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);

- ret = __writeback_single_inode(inode, wb, wbc);
+ ret = __writeback_single_inode(inode, wbc);

spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
@@ -673,7 +672,7 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
* We use I_SYNC to pin the inode in memory. While it is set
* evict_inode() will wait so the inode cannot be freed.
*/
- __writeback_single_inode(inode, wb, &wbc);
+ __writeback_single_inode(inode, &wbc);

work->nr_pages -= write_chunk - wbc.nr_to_write;
wrote += write_chunk - wbc.nr_to_write;
--
1.7.9.5


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-26 14:21    [W:0.030 / U:1.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site