Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:36:00 +0400 | From | Glauber Costa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] memcg: propagate kmem limiting information to children |
| |
On 08/17/2012 02:35 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> > But I never said that can't happen. I said (ok, I meant) the static >> > branches can't be disabled. > Ok, then I misunderstood that because the comment was there even before > static branches were introduced and it made sense to me. This is > inconsistent with what we do for user accounting because even if we set > limit to unlimitted we still account. Why should we differ here?
Well, we account even without a limit for user accounting. This is a fundamental difference, no ?
| |