Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:35:01 +0200 | From | Michal Hocko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] memcg: propagate kmem limiting information to children |
| |
On Tue 21-08-12 09:54:30, Michal Hocko wrote: > E.g. how do you handle charges you left behind? Say you charged some > pages for stack?
I got to the last patch and see how you do it. You are relying on free_accounted_pages directly which doesn't check kmem_accounted and uses PageUsed bit instead. So this is correct. I guess you are relying on the life cycle of the object in general so other types of objects should be safe as well and there shouldn't be any leaks. It is just that the memcg life time is not bounded now. Will think about that. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
| |