lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch -resend] [media] az6007: precedence bug in az6007_i2c_xfer()
Em 27-06-2012 06:06, Dan Carpenter escreveu:
> The intent here was to test that the flag was clear but the '!' has
> higher precedence than the '&'. I2C_M_RD is 0x1 so the current code is
> equivalent to "&& (!sgs[i].flags) ..."
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> I sent this originally on Wed, 25 Jan 2012 and Emil Goode sent the same
> fix on Thu, May 3, 2012.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/az6007.c b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/az6007.c
> index 4008b9c..f6f0cf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/az6007.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/az6007.c
> @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ static int az6007_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[],
> addr = msgs[i].addr << 1;
> if (((i + 1) < num)
> && (msgs[i].len == 1)
> - && (!msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD)
> + && (!(msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD))
> && (msgs[i + 1].flags & I2C_M_RD)
> && (msgs[i].addr == msgs[i + 1].addr)) {
> /*
>

Dan,

Your logic is correct, however, I didn't apply this patch because it broke
the driver.

I'll need to re-visit the driver when I have some time, in order to be
able to apply this one, without breaking the driver. I'll likely need to
change some other things on this routine.

(this has a low priority, as the driver is working properly the way it is).

So, I'm keeping your patch at patchwork, while I don't find some time for it.

Regards,
Mauro



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-27 15:41    [W:0.771 / U:0.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site