Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:23:20 -0500 | From | Sasha Levin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] alpha: use BUG_ON where possible |
| |
Hi Jiri,
On 11/08/2012 04:42 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> Just use BUG_ON() instead of constructions such as: >> >> if (...) >> BUG() >> >> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation >> is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) >> >> // <smpl> >> @@ >> expression e; >> @@ >> - if (e) BUG(); >> + BUG_ON(e); > > Ok, I guess I am just going to apply this one. Thanks, >
So I have about 80 more of these. I've sent out the first 10 to make sure that they look fine and the only complaints I got about them are that they are trivial :)
Can I send the rest directly to you to go through the trivial tree?
Thanks, Sasha
| |