lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [stable] 2.6.32.21 - uptime related crashes?
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:02:23PM -0800, john stultz wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 15:45 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 01:25:45AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:44:30PM -0700, john stultz wrote:
> > > > The softlockup false positive issue should have been fixed by Peter's
> > > > "x86, intel: Don't mark sched_clock() as stable" below. But I'm not
> > > > seeing it upstream. Peter, is this still the right fix?
> > >
> > > I've not seen any other one proposed, and both you and Peter appeared
> > > to like it. I understood that Ingo was waiting for the merge window to
> > > submit it and I think that it simply got lost.
> > >
> > > Ingo, can you confirm ?
> >
> > I'm totally confused here, what's the status of this, and what exactly
> > is the patch?
>
> Ingo has the fix from Salman queued in -tip, but I'm not sure why its
> not been pushed to Linus yet.
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git;a=commit;h=4cecf6d401a01d054afc1e5f605bcbfe553cb9b9

Wonderful, thanks for pointing this out to me.

Ingo, any idea when this will go to Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-03 02:13    [W:0.121 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site