Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [stable] 2.6.32.21 - uptime related crashes? | From | john stultz <> | Date | Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:02:23 -0800 |
| |
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 15:45 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 01:25:45AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:44:30PM -0700, john stultz wrote: > > > The softlockup false positive issue should have been fixed by Peter's > > > "x86, intel: Don't mark sched_clock() as stable" below. But I'm not > > > seeing it upstream. Peter, is this still the right fix? > > > > I've not seen any other one proposed, and both you and Peter appeared > > to like it. I understood that Ingo was waiting for the merge window to > > submit it and I think that it simply got lost. > > > > Ingo, can you confirm ? > > I'm totally confused here, what's the status of this, and what exactly > is the patch?
Ingo has the fix from Salman queued in -tip, but I'm not sure why its not been pushed to Linus yet.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git;a=commit;h=4cecf6d401a01d054afc1e5f605bcbfe553cb9b9
thanks -john
| |