lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [stable] 2.6.32.21 - uptime related crashes?
From
Date
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 15:45 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 01:25:45AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:44:30PM -0700, john stultz wrote:
> > > The softlockup false positive issue should have been fixed by Peter's
> > > "x86, intel: Don't mark sched_clock() as stable" below. But I'm not
> > > seeing it upstream. Peter, is this still the right fix?
> >
> > I've not seen any other one proposed, and both you and Peter appeared
> > to like it. I understood that Ingo was waiting for the merge window to
> > submit it and I think that it simply got lost.
> >
> > Ingo, can you confirm ?
>
> I'm totally confused here, what's the status of this, and what exactly
> is the patch?

Ingo has the fix from Salman queued in -tip, but I'm not sure why its
not been pushed to Linus yet.

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git;a=commit;h=4cecf6d401a01d054afc1e5f605bcbfe553cb9b9

thanks
-john



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-03 01:05    [W:0.134 / U:1.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site