lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [stable] 2.6.32.21 - uptime related crashes?
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 01:25:45AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:44:30PM -0700, john stultz wrote:
> > The softlockup false positive issue should have been fixed by Peter's
> > "x86, intel: Don't mark sched_clock() as stable" below. But I'm not
> > seeing it upstream. Peter, is this still the right fix?
>
> I've not seen any other one proposed, and both you and Peter appeared
> to like it. I understood that Ingo was waiting for the merge window to
> submit it and I think that it simply got lost.
>
> Ingo, can you confirm ?

I'm totally confused here, what's the status of this, and what exactly
is the patch?

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-03 00:49    [W:1.730 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site