[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]

You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below:

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Michael Kerrisk
<> wrote:
> Miklos,
> I already fixed most of the isues with utimensat() in my previous
> version of the patch several days back, and that patch (probably
> still) applies against current mainline.
> This is a bug. It is one of *several* bugs in the original
> implementation of the utimensat()/futimens() interface. All of them
> should be fixed. I have by now provided fixes for most of them. (Not
> point 2 above, but with a little help that should be quickly fixed as
> well.) At this point, I think you need to explain why you think those
> fixes shouldn't be applied.


Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer;
Found a bug?

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-30 21:47    [W:0.078 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site