Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 31 May 2008 07:28:54 +0200 | From | "Michael Kerrisk" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3] |
| |
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote: > Michael, > >> You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below: > > Oh, come on. Where in my last mail did I say that these fixes > shouldn't be applied?
I didn't say you did. However, while saying "I understand your frustration", you simply ignored this question, which I would say was fairly important in the context, and asked me to write another version of the patch against your tree. My takeaway from this is that you attach a higher priority to seeing that your tree isn't broken, than to seeing that these bugs get fixed.
Cheers,
Michael
-- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
| |