[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Miklos Szeredi <> wrote:
> Michael,
>> You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below:
> Oh, come on. Where in my last mail did I say that these fixes
> shouldn't be applied?

I didn't say you did. However, while saying "I understand your
frustration", you simply ignored this question, which I would say was
fairly important in the context, and asked me to write another version
of the patch against your tree. My takeaway from this is that you
attach a higher priority to seeing that your tree isn't broken, than
to seeing that these bugs get fixed.



Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer;
Found a bug?

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-31 07:31    [W:0.076 / U:1.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site